Monday, August 09, 2010
State of Rhode Island Mortgage Foreclosure and Sale General Laws.
Ref. SECTION 34-27-2
WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp.borrowers
Your states laws and code of enforcement is specific. Under the section § 34-27-2 you maintain a right of mortgagee to bid at sale. – At any sale by public auction made under and according to the provisions of any mortgage of real estate, or of any power of sale contained therein or annexed thereto, the mortgagee in the deed of mortgage or other conveyance, or pledgee, his, her, or their assigns, or his, her, or their heirs, executors or administrators, or any person for him, her, or them, may fairly and in good faith bid for and purchase the estate or property so put up for sale, or any part thereof, in the same manner as it may be bid for and purchased by any other person.
The issuer of the certificates is the Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2007-OA3 Trust (the “Trust”), deemed a statutory trust formed under the laws of the State of Delaware pursuant to a trust agreement between WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp., as depositor, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware trustee. The pooling and servicing agreement, dated as of the Cut- Off Date (the “pooling agreement”), among the depositor, Washington Mutual Bank, as servicer, the Delaware trustee and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee, will restate the trust agreement and will be the governing instrument of the Trust.
The Trust will not own any assets other than the mortgage loans and the other assets described below. The Trust will not have any liabilities other than those incurred in connection with the pooling agreement and any related agreement. The Trust will not have any directors, officers or other employees. No equity contribution will be made to the Trust by either co-sponsor, the depositor or any other party, except for a de minimis contribution made by the depositor pursuant to the trust agreement, and the Trust will not have any other capital. The fiscal year end of the Trust will be December 31.
The Trust will act through the trustee and the Delaware trustee, whose fees and reasonable expenses will be paid or reimbursed by Washington Mutual Bank, as servicer.
Assignment of the Mortgage Loans and Other Assets to the Trust
A pool of mortgage loans, as described in this prospectus supplement, will be sold to the Trust on March 28, 2007 (the “Closing Date”). The Trust will own the right to receive all payments of principal and interest on the mortgage loans due after March 1, 2007 (the “Cut-Off Date”). A schedule to the pooling agreement will include information about each mortgage loan, including:
the applicable loan group or subgroup;
the outstanding principal balance as of the close of business on the Cut-Off Date;
the term of the mortgage loan; and
the mortgage interest rate as of the close of business on the Cut-Off Date and information about how that mortgage interest rate adjusts.
With respect to all of the mortgage loans in loan group 3, loan group 4 and loan group 5, the mortgage notes will not be endorsed to the Trust and no assignment of the mortgages to the Trust will be prepared. Washington Mutual Bank fsb, a wholly-owned subsidiary of WMB, will have possession of and will review the mortgage notes and mortgages related to those mortgage loans as custodian for the Trust and financing statements will be filed evidencing the Trust’s interest in those mortgage loans.
The mortgage pool will be the primary asset of the Trust. The Trust will also contain other assets, including:
Insurance policies related to individual mortgage loans, if applicable;
Any property that secured a mortgage loan that the Trust acquires after the Cut-Off Date by foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure;
The rights of the Trust under the Countrywide servicing agreement; and
Amounts held in the certificate account.
In exchange for the mortgage loans and the other assets described above, the trustee will authenticate and deliver the certificates pursuant to the order of the depositor. It is the intent of the parties to the pooling agreement that the conveyance of the mortgage loans and the related assets to the Trust constitute an absolute sale of those assets.However, in the event that the pooling agreement for any reason is held or deemed to create a security interest in those assets, then the pooling agreement will constitute a security agreement and the depositor grants to the Trust a security interest in those assets. The depositor will file financing statements perfecting such security interest.
Restrictions on Activities of the Trust
Pursuant to the pooling agreement, the Trust will have the power and authority (i) to acquire, hold, lease, manage, administer, control, invest, reinvest, operate and transfer assets of the Trust, (ii) to issue and make distributions on the certificates and (iii) to engage in such other activities as are described in the pooling agreement. The Trust will be required to act in accordance with requirements specified in the pooling agreement that are designed to maintain the Trust’s existence as a legal entity separate and distinct from any other entity. The Trust will not be permitted to do any of the following:
• to engage in any business or activity other than those described in the pooling agreement;
• to incur or assume any indebtedness other than indebtedness incurred under the pooling agreement or any related agreement;
• to guarantee or otherwise assume liability for the debts of any other entity;
• to confess a judgment against the Trust;
* to possess or assign the assets of the Trust for other than a Trust purpose;
• to lend any funds to any entity, except as contemplated by the pooling agreement; or
• to do other actions prohibited by the pooling agreement.
The permissible activities of the Trust may not be modified except by an amendment to the pooling agreement. See “Description of the Certificates—Amendment of the Pooling Agreement” in this prospectus supplement.
Discretionary Activities With Respect to the Trust
The following is a description of material discretionary activities that may be taken with regard to the administration of the mortgage loans or the certificates:
• Each of Washington Mutual Bank and Countrywide Home Loans will be authorized to exercise discretion with regard to its servicing of the related mortgage loans in accordance with the servicing standard specified in the pooling agreement and the Countrywide servicing agreement, respectively. See “Servicing of the Mortgage Loans—WMB—WMB’s Servicing Procedures” and “Servicing of the Mortgage Loans—Countrywide Home Loans—Countrywide Home Loans’ Servicing Obligations” in this prospectus supplement.
• Washington Mutual Bank will be authorized to exercise discretion with regard to the actions taken, as servicer, on behalf of the Trust, as assignee of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.’s rights under the Countrywide servicing agreement (including making requests or demands or giving consents to Countrywide Home Loans).
M.Soliman
expert.witness@live.com
Recognition of Trustee .
The Servicer recognizes the Trustee as owner of the Serviced Loans, and acknowledges that the Serviced Loans are part of a REMIC, and from and after the Effective Date, will service the Serviced Loans in accordance with the Servicing Agreement, as modified by this Agreement, but in no event in a manner that would (i) cause any REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC or (ii) result in the imposition of a tax upon any REMIC (including but not limited to the tax on prohibited transactions as defined in Section 860F(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) and the tax on contributions to a REMIC set forth in Section 860G(d) of the Code). It is the intention of the Servicer and the Trustee that this Agreement shall be binding upon and for the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto. The Servicer shall not amend or agree to amend, modify, waive, or otherwise alter any of the terms or provisions of the Servicing Agreement which amendment, modification, waiver or other alteration would in any way affect the Serviced Loans without the prior written consent of the Trustee.
Wednesday, August 04, 2010
TRUSTEE INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS
While some torts are also crimes punishable with imprisonment, the primary aim of tort law is to provide relief for the damages incurred and deter others from committing the same harms. While separated by definition, a breach tends to go hand in hand with a civil tort. This may be especially true in the business of “constructing” foreclosures where collateral is clearly lost to the beneficiary listed on the deed of trust. California courts have commented and that under the statutory scheme for nonjudicial foreclosure, the covenant of good faith is coextensive with respondent’s duty to conduct the foreclosure proceedings fairly, openly and in good faith. (See, e.g., Baron v. Colonial Mortgage Service Co. (1980) .
That duty , conducting the foreclosure proceedings fairly, openly and in good faith, is proffered by the court to extend to all participants in the sale, including prospective bidders.]; Block v. Tobin (1975) 45 The trustee owes a duty to conduct the sale fairly and openly and to secure the best possible price for the benefit of the trustor.
The elements of a cause of action for intentional interference with contract are (1) a valid contract between plaintiff and a third party; (2) defendants knowledge of this contract; (3) defendants intentional acts designed to induce a breach or disruption of the contractual relationship; (4) actual breach or disruption of the contractual relationship; and (5) resulting damage. /Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co. (1990) 50
Injured parties may sue for an injunction to prevent the continuation of the tortious conduct by rouge collections firms who stand-in for a trustee. Injured parties may sue for monetary damages and they include both present and future expected losses. But this say’s little if anything for the quest to maintain possession.
Courts have enunciated loudly (in a prior life) a duty in the trustee in the conduct of a sale itself. A sale under a power in a mortgage or trust deed must be conducted in strict compliance with the terms of the power. The sale must be made fairly, openly, reasonably, and with due diligence and sound discretion to protect the rights of the mortgagor and others, using all reasonable efforts to secure the best possible or reasonable price.
There are numerous specific torts including trespass, negligence, Loan products liability, and distress. Intentional torts are those wrongs which the defendant knew or should have known would occur through their actions or inactions. Negligent torts occur when the defendant's actions were unreasonably unsafe. Strict liability wrongs do not depend on the degree of carefulness by the defendant, But are established when a particular action causes damage.
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
SOLIMAN AND RECENT PRESS
The Other Real Estate Crisis Newsweek Voices - Daniel Gross ...
Jan 9, 2008 ... This information is offered by Maher Soliman, the web site ... unity is not yet complete Angela Merkel on Berlin Wall anniversary CNN ...www.newsweek.com/id/87984 - Cached - Similar -
Recession-Proof Real Estate? Newsweek Business Newsweek.com
Jan 30, 2008 ... Saw somthing on TV - Maher Soliman, the managing Director for a ... unity is not yet complete Angela Merkel on Berlin Wall anniversary CNN ...www.newsweek.com/id/106188 - Cached - Similar -
Stumper : BAILEY: With McCain and the Economy, Is the Third Time ... - Nov 7
Here's my NEWSWEEK colleague Holly Bailey with a report from the McCain caravan in ... According to Maher Soliman, an analyst with www.borrowerhotline.com ...blog.newsweek.com/.../bailey-with-mccain-and-the-economy-is-the-third-time-the-charm.aspx - Cached - Similar -
CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive ...
May 7, 2008 ... Newsweek article said that one of the members of the Illinois State Senate wanted to run for the U.S. Senate. ...... By BRODY MULLINS and KRIS MAHER May 5, 2008; Page A1 ...... Khaled Soliman, May 7th, 2008 4:44 pm ET ...politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/.../blitzer-what-would-you-like-me-to-ask-barack-obama/ - Similar -
BorrowerClaims: WHY MORTGAGE SECURTIZATION DOES NOT WORK - Nov 7
Jan 7, 2009 ... According to Soliman, "I changed my views and no longer see the problem ... news organizations (Newsweek, CNN and MSNBC) over the internet. ...borrowerclaims.blogspot.com/.../why-mortgage-securtization-does-not.html - Similar -
SubPrime Expert: 06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008
Real Estate: Making Mortgage Loan Counseling Mandatory Newsweek Voices ..... Telephone number 310-765-7388. Maher Soliman Nationwide Loan Services. ...www.foreclosureinfosearch.com/2008_06_01_archive.html - Cached - Similar -
Foreclosureinfosearch / Call Us 310-765-7388: Newsweek Samulson ...
According to Newsweek published report / Samulson: Retail sales dropped 1.2 ... Maher Soliman, analyst for consumer homeowner website said "Samuelson is ...www.foreclosureinfosearch.com/.../newsweek-samulson-storyline-comments.html - Similar -
Show more results from www.foreclosureinfosearch.com
Yahoo! 360° - Entries tagged "cnn"
By Maher Soliman January 30th 2008 / For Immediate Release; ... Tags: foreclosure, countrywide, bankofamerica, newsweek, cnn, latimes ...blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-OUNCBoQifqUOW48iXYNCSEwZyrLGqcjE1Kc-?...cnn - Similar -
Stop Foreclosure! www.borrowerhotline.com
Mar 20, 2008 ... Issue #1 - America's Money: All this week at 12 pm ET, CNN explains how .... Maher Soliman, Managing Director for www.Borrowerhotline.com ...borrowerhotline.blogspot.com/ - Cached - Similar -
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Lender Conferences Gearing Up
Friday, July 17, 2009
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Foreclosures Report: 1.5 million homes in foreclosure
Sunday, May 31, 2009
Thursday, April 02, 2009
Wachovia Mortgage Loan Trust, LLC Series 2006-A Trust.
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Bankruptcy Will Stop A Foreclosure–
Sunday, March 08, 2009
MORTGAGE BANKING EXPERT WITNESS
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Atlanta Foreclosures
Sunday, January 18, 2009
mortgage defaults and foreclosures continue to rise
Monday, December 22, 2008
WHEN FORECLOSURES CAUSE HUD AND THE SEC TO COLLIDE
Monday, October 20, 2008
WEB SITE SHOWS YOU HOW TO STOP FORECLOSURE
Compliance Examiners are a Must to Keep Home!
Monday, October 06, 2008
Sunday, September 07, 2008
Sunday, August 24, 2008
Tuesday, July 08, 2008
Stop Foreclosure! www.borrowerhotline.com
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Entry for May 10, 2008
Maher E Soliman
NLS Director
Experienced Wall Street institutional auditors backed by legal professionals serving foreclsure victims. Our auditors are looking for instances of predatory lending, such as
· Deceptive lender practices,
· Unlawful acceptance,
· Negligent lending against minorities,
· Equity skimming,
· Non compliance,
· Violations of lenders own published guidelines,
· Over charging,
· No benefit to the borrower loans,
· Underwriter unwarranted exceptions,
· Deceptive Disclosure (computer generated 1003 applications)
· Reg Z Violations (absence of a handwritten application)
Fact: Unlawful lending practices are common in instances where a lender offers a Stated Income loan program.
Information: A lender is required to have you complete an application in your own handwriting. If not, you should initial all critical discloser information; such as your income, assets and time in current residence. Falsification of income and assets, absent of a handwritten application, is deceptive act. The occurrences’ of such are often prevalent with a Lenders “Stated Income and Stated Assets” programs. Income and credit acceptance misrepresentation, if unbeknownst to a borrower, are grounds for a loan rescission.
NLS Nationwide Loan Settlement707 Wilshire Boulevard
Experts Corner: Another FDIC Bank Failure
American Marine Bank
News of another FDIC member bank falling under the FDIC control was published late this week. The “
Our question is to whom? Who is the holder in due course?The purpose of this analysis and discussion of the FDIC are subject to the various parties’ who have interest in your loan. It’s about their representations, conduct and decisions made while enforcing a foreclosure. Making a bad decision or employing conduct viewed to be deceptive will cause any transaction or enforcement of a right to a security to be rendered voidable.
Furthermore the asset may suffer from malfeasance and willful error and omissions causing the loan to be valued far below its market value due to serious impairment. Successfully demonstrating in court the reasons why your loan has become so seriously impaired that the real security, a deed of trust or mortgage, will fall into a judicial abyss and subject the true holder in due course to lose its rights to in a recovery of the asset in a foreclosure. In other words the right to accelerate and foreclose becomes lost to the transaction
Your loan was likely sold after it originated. A sale of the asset versus a government backed insurance guaranty is the single most controversial component of the subprime lenders dilemma.
A bonifide sale and transfer must be evidenced which differentiates the private label loans from the GSE or Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac class of loans delivered to Wall Street.
In a true sale the lender who sold it is lost to the privileges and rights to the asset forever. So I guess the question is not so much about a foreclosure due to a breach and delinquent obligation. This discussion is for us to understand to “whom” you owe the money and what right do they have to enforce the obligation and right to foreclose? Lawful Transfers
A “transfer” is the “streets” vernacular for booking a sale of a loan or pool of loans. The transfer of an asset by the lender to a less than arms investor is routinely conducted solely for accounting purposes. None the less it’s a sale that is forever entered in to the books.
The purpose of this analysis and discussion of the FDIC are subject to the various parties’ representations and decision making that may cause the asset to become so impaired that the real security, a deed of trust or mortgage becomes lost to the transaction. My last sale as a trader was a transfer of a bulk pool of “toxic waste” was back in 2001. The loans acquired and sold under my direction were never really that bad as we had one of the lowest delinquency rates in the region for sub prime assets sold and serviced. What I do know or at least remember from my days of bulk whole loan trading was from selling to the same major market leaders who are in trouble today.
Let’s back up for a moment to consider how accountants arrive at a specific value. A valuation is necessary for a foreclosure to take place just as it is for the original loan to be sold. A sale involves a contract and the essential elements f the law amongst the two parties. The first is consideration (money) and the second is the intent of the parties for lawful exchange and or transfer.
Consideration is required for transferring any good or service amongst one party to another, including a sale of a bulk pool of mortgage loan receivables.
If a mortgage is valued at par then you typically measure its worth at the combined cost to date or basis in the asset. A true and more accurate valuation is based upon the market and what one will pay assuming demand. It’s the true inherent value of a gallon of milk that will force someone to go elsewhere or not to drink milk at all. The same rationale holds true for an asset such as a closed mortgage receivable subject to its ability to attract a fair price in an open market. A mark to market value is entered by an accountant prior to sale if the owner is seeking to value the worth of the assets it holds.
Estimating value based on the future worth of an asset is something that continues to attract criticism whereby a historical valuation is entered based on a discounted future value. A presumption of value is calculated in a variety of ways sometimes using an internal rate of return offset by depreciation. In the mortgage industry I call this type of valuation complete lunacy. And this is where things get interesting with taking a look back at the cause of the mess we are now in.
Generally Accepted Accounting Principals aka “GAAP” allows us a standard to apply a historical value on a loan which is necessary for estimating consistency as with the life of a loan. The terms of the note say 30 years but we know that homeowners rarely keep a loan to term. Valuations use variables such as prepayment velocity or life based on a traditional or historic early payoff.
The CPR is the measurement of prepayment speed determine from reversion (sale of a home) refinance or the opposite end of the spectrum which is delinquency and default. Mortgages originated over the last decade were attributed an estimated holding time or CPR of say 60 months. Other things that influence price and for understanding the lenders desire to become fixated with the sub prime mortgage sector are subject to ethical scrutiny. I am referring to extreme maximum leverage used to buy loans and the introduction of something called accounting practices such as derecongnition. The latter is suspect, according to many accountants, as it offer no real value to a transfer and subject to entering a “gain on sale.”
The "streets" ability to substantiate its reporting methods. The Expert Witness must have among other things a legal understanding and verifiable accounting practices background. So figure an offshore investor will take a coupon of 1% at twice the current alternative which was a US Treasury. So I guess a WAC of 8% would yield on $100,000 certificate up to $800,000 in capital investment. Or is that $100,000 yielding 8 separate $100,000 certificates?
What ever it is its six of one and half a dozen of the other. It makes me want to run to the Hampton's and buy the biggest home they can offer. It makes me want to find the worse of the worse credit and put them into a loan.....any loan.
The problem with this madness conducted under the great GWB (and side kick “Don't call me Cheney call me "Dick”) administration is the regulatory absence for the bubble Wall Street elite would eventually pop.
The money raised was at a huge multiple and was causing CDO product to suffer from heavy demand internationally in a market that had long exceeded capacity. ( . . . .It makes me cringe and recall the old Keystone Kops silent flicks; remember the morons running around that said nothing and were always trying to help while and causing even more chaos …..Anyway!
I cannot pinpoint of fully grasp the role of the FDIC here but fear we may have an accounting play that shows the bank lines were actually used as “paid in capital” . It’s called derecongnition under GAAP and FASB accounting pronouncements for isolating the source and use of funds.
Will this help your arguments to save your home? YOU BET IT WILL! The big question is where the logic here is and why would the bank regulators let this happen? These Pretender Lenders were not pretenders at all. I call them “Tender Lenders” who tendered a note like currency instead of parking it in a vault like the asset it is. Therefore when tendered the check is electronically debited (hmm) and treated like a cancelled check.
The lost note is not a coat lost by a child at school. It’s lost to the payee who failed to deliver to the payor that check evidencing a debit stamped paid in full.
Hey, Barney just a minute . . . Hey, Wilma I’m home!!!!! So lets say these guys raised volumes of cash at huge multiples and did so with FDIC capitalization or tax payer insured capital contributions into a “NewCo” or De novo or S*P* E*.
If so, I feel the SPE is more like an STD and its all absolute "Bull Crepes". Where did these guys put all the capitalization anyway from money and stock…Huh? Especially with all these stringent FDIC risk weight capital set aside requirements. It’s a regulatory capital priority and basic fiscal mandate enforced by the OTS.
I got to know, where did they "Deposit" the money and stock ...do you know? I am referring to the "Deposits by the Wall Street “Depositors” you see. Deposited, Depositor, Depository, Restroom, tell me Wendy! Where’s the beef! Howard, who goofed I must known, who goofed!
Hey! ....wait a minute!!!....D*E*P*O*S*I*T*O*R*S! Yikes…OMG! How much more can we take!
So back to the failure of another institution, one of Americas and Pacific Northwest’s finest! American Marine Bank. So who do we bring an action against now? FDIC say’s “for all questions regarding “new” loans and the lending policies of the new successor call Columbia State Bank, and to please contact your branch office.
They continue that shares of American Marine Bank were owned by its holding company, AMB Financial Services Corporation, Bainbridge Island, WA. The holding company was not included in the closing of the bank or the resulting receivership. So if you are a shareholder of AMB Financial Services Corporation, please do not contact or file a claim with the Receiver. You may contact AMB Financial Services Corporation directly for information. How convenient is that….a BK waiting to happen.
The FDIC claims it does offer a reference guide to deposit brokers acting as agents for their investor clientele. This web site outlines the FDIC's policies and procedures that must be followed by deposit brokers when filing for pass-through insurance coverage on custodial accounts deposited in a failed FDIC Insured Institution. Wait a minute here now just slow down. FDIC makes no mention of a lender consumer grievance, and tells us to call the broke parent of the bank. Now are these loans in question considered FDIC troubled assets? Okay, we cannot help you with a predator loan but we will be back to foreclose on you?
My heart is pounding right now and I cannot take anymore folks…..really! But on a more serious note, consider the following. A bad notary signature, broken promise by a “Tender Lender” or forged MERS document is not the argument to bet the house on (no pun intended) It won’t get you to the promised land so can the need for an audit. It won’t get you to the Promised Land, so here is my advice!
SAVE YOUR MONEY! . . . UNLESS YOU WANT TO BORE THE HELL OUT OF A JUDGE AND GET THROWN OUT OF COURT.
It’s time to step up or step down!
By "Toxic Waste Guru" (LOL)
M.Soliman
expert.witness@live.com
REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPLICABLE CUSTODIAN .
(ii) If Custodian determines that the documents in the MortgageFilefor a Delivered Mortgage Loan conform in all respects with Section3(b)(i),and unless otherwise notified by Buyer in accordance with Section3(b)(i),Custodian shall include such Mortgage Loan in the CustodialMortgage LoanSchedule issued to Buyer.
If the documents required in any Mortgagedonot conform (except as otherwise notified in Section 3(b)(i)),Custodianshall not include such Mortgage Loan in any Custodial Mortgage LoanSchedule. Custodian shall notify Sellers and Buyer of any documentsthatare missing, incomplete on their face or patently inconsistent andof anyMortgage Loans that do not satisfy the criteria listed above.Sellers shallpromptly deposit such missing documents with Custodian or completeorcorrect the documents as required by Section 3(a) or remove therelatedMortgage File from the Request for Certification.
On or prior tothePurchase Date and as a condition to purchase, except with respectto aWet-Ink Mortgage Loan, Custodian shall deliver to the Buyer anelectronicCustodial Mortgage Loan Schedule to the effect that the Custodianhasreceived the Mortgage File for each Purchased Mortgage Loan on theMortgageLoan Schedule and as to each Mortgage File, specifying any documendelivered and any original document that has not been received, andverifying the items listed in this Section 3(b).(c) As required by Section 3(a), Custodian shall deliver to Buyer,nolater than 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the related Purchase Date(provided, thatthe
Custodian has timely received the items required in Section2(b) herein),electronically or via facsimile, followed, if requested in writingby Buyer, byovernight courier, a Custodial Mortgage Loan Schedule havingappended thereto aschedule of all Mortgage Loans with respect to which Custodian hascompleted theprocedures set forth in Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(i) hereof andcertify that it isholding each related Mortgage File for the benefit of Buyer inaccordance withthe terms hereof.
Pleading (Not for Use) Lenders egregious, ongoing and far reaching fraudulent schemes
Fight Foreclosures Legally - Anti Predatory Lending Initiative
Lenders who Lied about Loan Modification Programs
Jun 23, 2010 ... The attorney will be able to cut through the lender lies and review the true financial status of the borrower in order to paint
THIS IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE!!
If you don’t file a timely response, the plaintiff can petition the court for a “default judgment” and possibly win the lawsuit simply because you failed to respond.
First call an Attorney Immediately. An attorney experienced in defending against the type of lawsuit you’ve been served with will undoubtedly be the best tool in your defense toolbox.
Lawyers are knowledgeable about the procedures involved in lawsuits and skilled at making persuasive arguments to a judge or a jury in your defense. An attorney can also help you try to settle the case out of court as an alternative.This blog only describes situational circumstances and no witness can offer legal advice. M.Soliman is an "expert witness" and not an attorney nor affiliated under a licensed prationer.
This web site does NOT advocate nor believe that modifications exist and will not be involvved in any modificiation or other short sale settlement offers.
Consult an attorney first for your specific problem. NO attorney-client relationship exists.
TagsMagPortal FindArticles Fast Company Fortune Inc. Business Week Business 2.0 Forbes Time
Fraud, audit government, bailout bankruptcy shortsale, lawyers, sheriffs, deed upon, unfair, borrower borrowers Chapter 13 Clinton countrywide credit credit crisis depression disclosure dollar euro Eviction Federal reserve foreclosure foreclosure defense foreclosure offense foreclosures fraud housing inflation lawyers lender Lender Liability lenders lost note McCain money Mortgage mortgage meltdown Obama Paulson predatory lending quiet title recession rescission RESPA RICO securitization TILA TILA audit trustee Wells Fargo
