WE ARE BACK

You’vemay have joined a select group of consumer homeowners who are a growing category of victims of a highly illegal Real Estate fraud. Transfers of reality have occurred and in open and notorious manner. Notes and Mortgages set forth the claim to assignment and security rights contract that are void ab initio pursuant to Civil Code §1572 and/or will be avoided and recovered under 11 U.S.C. §548(a)1(b)(3) as fraudulent transfers and obligations.


I opineas an expert witness testifying in the matter of an unlawful transfer of title under a controlled sale. The accounting requirements necessary to evidence a valid repurchase of the loan alleged sold cannot survive scrutiny for which the sale is void due to a controlling elements of parties of interest. An open market transaction “OMT” must be conducted in a sterile uninfluenced environment. Only then will it qualify as a true highest bid for which a prevailing party is by chance can claim title rights as both the beneficiary and the grantee.

It is a continuation of the ongoing and running predatory acts against title conducted in an adverse manner by hostile parties’ engaged in an operative method and means for appearing to have met the accounting requirements necessary to reclaim assets charged to a write down and complete loss. Divestment of the note is a known Wall Street corollary for securitizing receivables financed on FDIC member bank lines of credit. Testimony intends to demonstrate the impossible foreclosure efforts by parties of interest that sold away such interest in the subject loan at the time of execution to the secondary.

These allegations if brought will be supported by meritorious claims in arguments citing “Enron” breach of accounting rules FAS 140 and SFAF 140-3 with respect to controlling a sale for purposes of recognition of the asset sold earlier.

Withholding of the government’s role for purposes of profiting in an private parties rules enforcement is a violation of civil code and USC as well as raising speculation for a violation of one’s civil liberties’ and constitutional amendments. A secretive an opaque method of conducting an open market bid deprives a title holder of thither constitutional rights to own property and live free of any threat against the seizure of house and title to home.

I opine from an insider advantage that Parties seeking to gain from the sale of the Milner property have conducted themselves under a secretive financing arrangement or counter parties understandings, as in a FDIC award through subrogation’s claim.

The winning bid is woefully insufficient to claim a senior right to enforce title recovery for a sale having occurred under the authority of the United States government. These types of rigged bid sales are non-complaint due to withholding information for an advantage and enhanced preferential treatment of parties alleging to have won the title in an open bid. This is what we have gathered to date for your assistance in the matter of a wrongful transfer of title. We would like to have you – “Milners” counsel reviews the following for immediate consideration of merit and for furthering a synergistic effort for his or her preference in arguments.